XPost: comp.lang.c, alt.conspiracy   
   From: toylet.toylet@gmail.com   
      
   Science may have pitfalls and weaknesses, but it still describes the   
   work of God fairly intelligently and logical.   
      
   Anyway, you still have the right to deny science and technology. That   
   will be *YOUR OWN* belief and religion. However, you don't need to   
   preach nor distribute your belief. Your preaching will become   
   disturbances like advertisements, sometimes noise pollution.   
      
   And others have the right to ignore sometimes deny your belief.   
      
   May the Force and farces be with you, live long and prosper!   
      
   On 3/12/2016 3:53 AM, Albert van der Horst wrote:   
   > Actually you're wrong here. The scientific method if applied properly   
   > will understand how all religions came to be, and how a person can have   
   > an ideology which includes a religious believe.   
   > A scientific ideology will require that you develop a Baysean network   
   > of probabilities for everything , so it cannot separate science   
   > and religion.   
   > In a persons mind this will readjust idea's to a fixed point that   
   > will never be reached, the truth. This doesn't "prove" or "disprove"   
   anything,   
   > but the result is a very low probability to the existance of a god, as   
   > the religions will have it. This by the way is called realism or -- formerly   
   --   
   > -- dialectical materialism.   
   > Scientist who want to believe can do so only by an artificial separation   
   > between scientic and religious ideas. They become schizofrenic so to say.   
   >   
   > So the scientific method in itself can be felt or construed as anti-religion.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)