XPost: alt.culture.egyptian, soc.culture.egyptian, alt.pagan   
   From: dalton@nfld.com   
      
   I while ago I said I detected by soul duality alignment   
   sensing (I forget if I said Happy was aligned with Anubis   
   or I had to align her) that the dog Happy described below   
   is the current avatar of Anubis.    She is big souled and   
   there is an alignement (now at least) between her soul   
   and that of Anubis and I think when she dies she will   
   merge back in with Anubis.    Thus that may be of interest   
   to Egyptians, pagans and mythology buffs on these groups.   
      
   This may be mostly of interest to readers in Newfoundland   
   and Labrador but perhaps others might be interested as   
   well.   I am in St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador.   
      
   My brother and sister-in-law's spayed female dog Happy   
   which is normally very good with family members, not   
   long ago snarled at their baby when it was playing on   
   the floor (maybe the baby pulled on its ear or something)   
   so they have taken it back to the SPCA.   
      
   Anyway if anyone wants her she is spayed, fairly   
   young, mostly golden lab, I think would make a very good   
   bird dog with a little training, is very strong for her   
   size, and very fast.   I think she would need a   
   strong adult owner who can walk fairly fast, and   
   would not get along with cats and based on the   
   above incident maybe not with babies either though   
   I was very surprised.   
      
   If you want more info on her her previous owners   
   are my  brother John and his wife Manon at 709-738-1547 .   
      
   I am pulling off newsgroups for a while, or so I have   
   said but I have had a few afterthought posts including   
   this one but those should taper off.]   
      
   As for aspects, one more comment is that many names   
   that Wiccans and Hindus and Joseph Campbell Foundation   
   people consider aspects may not have historical roots as   
   aspects but as distinct someones.   And again I do not consider   
   a subset to be an aspect (an aspect is a face put on by the   
   whole) and none of my deities are aspects.   For those   
   who say that a subset can be considered like a finger   
   of the whole, do you consider yourself to be an aspect   
   of ALL, and do you consider the finger to be a separate   
   someones, as my deities that are subsets of ALL are   
   defined by me?    If so then by your definition you are an   
   aspect of ALL and each someone other than ALL is   
   an aspect of ALL but not by my definition of aspect.   
      
   The aspect bullshit (much but not all of it) is just monotheists   
   trying to say they are polytheist when they are not.   If they   
   are monotheist just say so and stop using the names that   
   are historically not aspects as aspects.     But I think it   
   is fine to be actually polytheistic if you want, and not to try to   
   shove it into a form of monotheism, based on the idiocy that   
   the only someones are humans and one other someone.   
   I have one highest ranked deity ALL (and hence take none   
   other before it, i.e. it is highest ranked but there can be   
   others) and none of my other deities are aspects of it and   
   I do not consider by sensing that the Anubis named   
   above is an aspect of it or anything else.   However you   
   can be monotheistic if you want but don't force it   
   on others, and if you are monotheistic (including all   
   the Hindus and Joseph Campbell Foundation and Wiccan   
   and Catholic and others who worship aspects of a one)   
   say you are monotheistic.   I am polytheistic, and am   
   not pushing that on anyone, and none of my deities   
   are aspects.   
      
   David   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)