XPost: alt.magick.tyagi, alt.pagan, talk.religion.satanism   
   XPost: alt.satanism, alt.politics.satanism   
   From: satanservice.org@boboroshi   
      
   Hail Satan!!!   
      
   "Tani Jantsang ©" :   
   # "SOD of the CoE" wrote in message   
   #> "Tani Jantsang ©" :   
   #># bobo:   
      
   # Ghetto or not. Ben is here.   
      
   apparently you cannot correctly identify CoS spokespeople.   
      
   # I notice they continually post to me (I can see their brazen nicks right on   
   # there, like white on snow) even when I have not posted to them at all.   
      
   right. a certain amount of attention sustains them, sometimes minimal   
   for stellar personalities upon whom they feed. to an extent the   
   victimized and misfortunate may fall prey to such individuals.   
      
   #># ...you, Cat and I seem to agree on what their satanism arose   
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^   
   #># out of (Christianity)   
      
   I'm not sure this is true. I am not saying that you and sri catyananda   
   do not agree. she's said similar things before on the subject.   
   perhaps you agree that there is no resonance amongst 'Satanisms'.   
      
   #># and about the aesthetic or cultural values he went for (40s).   
      
   seems obvious enough, as any Satanist probably would.   
      
   #> see my posts in response to "si" recently. I don't think you and   
   #> I are completely aligned with regard to that.   
   #   
   # Wrong. I 100% agree that LaVeyan satanism comes from Christianity.   
      
   not sure to what "Wrong" refers. even LaVey said that his Satanism   
   emerged from Christian context. what's your point? you think   
   that LaVey and his Council of Nine believed that   
      
    1) they had been raised Christian?   
   or that 2) they were practicing a Christian faith?   
      
   I don't. if you do then your title and its withdrawal are amusing.   
   my recall is that LaVey specifies Satanism's transcultural nature   
   and does not limit it *to* Christianity in its birthing. apparently   
   you don't see cross-cultural symptoms. do you have reason to   
   question the existence of these types of 'anti-religion'?   
   or that LaVey's doesn't constitute a variety of these?   
      
   # I regard it as a subset of Christianity.   
      
   I call 'em 'Great Martyrdom Cult' examples. maybe you think   
   along similar lines. is Set mortal? if not, then why not? are   
   stories that link him with his brother Osiris in ever-lasting   
   everdying-rebirthing combat from some particular *type*   
   of Egyptian religion? if so, which kind and how much do   
   they overlap with modern Setianism? I'd be inclined to   
   conclude that a transcultural phenomenon (if LaVey is correct)   
   is *less* like Christianity than Setianism is like Judaism,   
   which Christianity is trying to subsume, overwhelm, take over.   
      
   # I do not agree that TOSetianism comes from it at all since   
   # it's all Egyptian (which is not from Xianity or related to   
   # Judeo Christianity at all)....   
      
   but that's what seems so weird, Tani. people say stuff like   
   this, but a great deal of emphasis IS placed upon Egypt as   
   a school and initiation-center of Moses or Moshe. this guy   
   is supposed to have been the *author* of the Big Jewish 5   
   *scripture* (Pentateuch), and the Christians are all hot to   
   make it *their* scripture too. does "Coming Forth by Day"   
   ('The Egyptian Book of the Dead'?) have implications for Jews?   
   can we pin the Egyptian god tail on the Jewish Yahweh? if not,   
   are they contemporaneous at points? are their worship-targets   
   ever immortal enemies or something, the way that Set *is*   
   paired with Osiris (precursive dying gods before Christianity)?   
      
   the Hermetics regard Egypt as the homeland of the Great   
   Thrice Hermes-Mercurio who was their Big Magician (tales).   
   Set is a type of improvement on the efforts of the Golden   
   Dawn and LaVey (IFF Christian and not transcultural).   
      
   by tapping directly into the Judeo-Christian magic central,   
   and aligning with a specific cultural adversary to Jews in   
   particular (compare Nazis, with whom you say he's been   
   unfairly associated, another anti-Jewish faction), this is   
   perhaps not Christian, but something akin to it (theistic   
   religion from the Middle-East worshipping a particular god).   
      
   LaVey described his Satanism as transcultural, and therefore   
   something which he had *discovered* amidst Christianity (not   
   too difficult as the dualism is dissected in symbolic glory   
   though millennia and a Satanist has much to work with).   
   thus Satanism (as Satan) appears in many valences, Setianism   
   bolding its ecclesia over time into an Egyptian obelisk.   
      
   *Setianism* and Christianity are, in this manner, more   
   completely adversaries (in a PERSONAL sense, by history),   
   whereas Satanism is just a projected drapery for what of   
   its many adversaries worried the Christians most which   
   might be inverted, turned against it, and glorified.   
      
   Setianism *is* religiously-exclusive, a type of deism with   
   its own theology, while Satanism tends toward the *anti*-   
   religious atheistic, or of great variety in spirit-engagement,   
   eradicating the need for theology on an altar of realism and   
   epicurean safeguards (evading superficial ghost-worlds).   
      
   of COURSE Satanism comes out of Christianity, like a   
   FRANKENSTEIN monster, the Bogey that got away from the poor   
   Christians (after the witches they burned and hanged) who   
   now watch it paraded about before them while they tremble   
   and shake in their shoes, warning all the police agencies.   
      
   Setianism is against Christianity as a direct competitor   
   to *Judaism* (which Christianity hopes to completely engulf   
   and subsume). Setianism is at *odds* with Judaism, isn't it?   
   the priesthoods don't *ever* intersect, do they? at cosmological   
   odds with one another, unless the Setians go to C.G. Jung and   
   beg and plead for help, their theology originates in *1* place   
   and is in this way inferior to the more inclusive vision of LaVey,   
   and the special pleading enlightenment offered by the CoE.   
      
   #> I'm more enamoured   
   #> of certain expressions elsewhere by LaVey on the matter of the   
   #> transcultural existence of Satanism, its name differing within   
   #> ever culture it may appear.   
      
   this disputes your notion that Satanism is a type of Christianity   
   (because it erupts within several systems, as portrayed by LaVey   
   and others; Barton's Quotations has something to this effect :>).   
      
   # The problem is that some cultures were LHP cultures....   
      
   unimportant as far as I know. if LHP is anti-cultural,   
   this complicates the nature of 'LHP culture'.   
      
   inasmuch as   
      
   Chaos > Vamamarga > Satanism > Thelema   
   anti anti anti anti   
   order culture religion corporation   
      
   what is Vamamarga's relation to culture, OTHER than that of negation?   
   does it not runs *against* cultural standards? perhaps crude reflections   
   or presages, heralds, are seen in orientalist Satanism outbreaks.   
      
   # ...our DEITY is the BLACK GOD OF TRANSCENDENT AWARENESS....   
      
   doesn't sound like Satan or some being that Christians mistook   
   to *be* Satan (aside from your ignorant Christian friends who   
   didn't know any better or who are smitten with devil-hatred).   
      
   # ...The nature we are is NOMADIC....   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|