XPost: alt.music.s-mclachlan, alt.music.lilith-fair   
   From: dalton@nfld.com   
      
   On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:01:54 -0330, David Dalton    
   wrote:   
      
   >And again I define a bif by who she is attracted to, not on the   
   >basis of her sexual history, and a lesbian who says she is a   
   >bif is not a bif  even if she has sex with men she is not   
   >attracted to.   
      
   Also a bif (a woman who is regularly and significantly   
   attracted to both genders) who chooses to have sex   
   with just men is not straight, she is bi, by my definition   
   of bisexual, which is the only sane way to define it,   
   and gay and lesbian are similarly defined as those   
   who just have attraction to those of the same   
   gender (except for rare transgendered exceptions).   
      
   But just as Sarah has a lock on me so I can   
   get nobody else strongly compatible with me   
   (and I have no partial compatibility, unlike her),   
   I have a lock on her so she can get nobody   
   else strongly compatible with her (other 4th-O   
   males, lesbians and bifs) but can only get   
   partially compatible  with her bims and   
   purestraight males  (1/10 as good as   
   strong compatability in terms of orgasm and   
   also would mean shorter lifespan) and   
   incompatible with her gays saying they are not.   
   So of course she has not had sex with women   
   unless a transgendered one.   
      
   The primary eternal vow between us means   
   such locks automatically, it is not as if we   
   consciously in this life placed them there.   
      
   Hylas, you set me off again, but I'll   
   try to wind down the sex talk after this post.   
      
   David   
   http://www.nfld.com/~dalton   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)