XPost: alt.religion.jehovahs-witn, alt.talk.creationism, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.history.future   
   From: basic@blubber.es   
      
   Bob Kolker wrote:   
   > Jabriol-Basic wrote:   
   >   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> There is a record. But that record you refuse to accept.   
   >   
   > There is not enough water on earth or in its atmosphere to cover all the   
   > land.   
   >   
      
   You have some sort of scientific evidence for this?   
      
   >> However I can put on my Atheist sombrero and say that the Black Sea   
   >> Stories are hog wash. Why should I accept those in lieu of the jewish   
   >> one?   
   >   
   > Bob Ballard (he who found Titanic) found substantial evidence of a Black   
   > Sea flood. We are talking about seeing human dwelling structures   
   > underwater and evidence how the Black Sea was once impounded and the   
   > barrier holding it in gave way.   
   >   
      
   What next Atlantis? Do you have reference? I could say those dwelling   
   are pre-Noah flood.   
      
   > Old wives tales are not scientific evidence. Nothing in the Bible (or   
   > the Q'ran or the I Ching) qualifies as scientific evidence.   
   >   
   > Bob Kolker   
   >   
      
   The Bible is not a scientific manual. But it does have evidence of many   
   things.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)