XPost: uk.legal, soc.culture.irish, soc.women   
   XPost: alt.religion.druid   
   From: NOTsomeone@microsoft.com   
      
   On 20/09/2012 10:02, Norman Wells wrote:   
      
   > That is uttely consistent with the BAPS statement that "there is rarely   
   > a clinical indication for circumcision",   
      
   Nevertheless, they are no longer saying what you said they are saying.   
   So, your quotation is out of date.   
      
      
   > and is totally contrary to   
   > Cynic's lie that "medical problems make male circumcision something that   
   > is _very commonly_ necessary for medical reasons".   
      
   You are missing the difference between prophylactic and urgently   
   necessary.  As I explained using my wife's osteoporosis as an example,   
   the UK medical profession seems to be terribly short-sighted.   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   > It isn't.  In the   
   > main, it's done simply because parents want to mutilate their children   
   > to impose their will on them.   
   >   
   What baloney. And your source for this is?  Your fevered imagination?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)