XPost: soc.culture.native, nz.soc.maori, alt.religion.shamanism   
   XPost: talk.religion.newage   
   From: miketwofeathers@gmail.com   
      
   David Dalton wrote:   
   > Do followers of traditional native spirituality consider   
   > themselves to be pagan?   I have usually assumed no and   
   > considered pagans and followers of traditional native   
   > spirituality separately.   Likewise I consider pagans   
   > and followers of Chinese folk religion separately.   
   >   
   well i don't consider myself a pagan, and i live native ways but don't   
   consider myself a follower, i don't think it deals with following but   
   living........and if i follow the original intent of the word pagan   
   which means anyone that follows or lives a way other than abrahamic then   
   yes i imagine i would be called pagan by those following such types of   
   abrahamic relegions.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)