Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.native    |    Pretty sure excluding the pilgrims    |    29,288 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 27,577 of 29,288    |
|    skepticl1@aol.com to All    |
|    Native Blood: The Myth of Thanksgiving (    |
|    21 Nov 12 17:52:03    |
      19c5c4fd       XPost: alt.sports.football.pro.sf-49ers, alt.atheism, alt.fan.art-bell              Native Blood: The Myth of Thanksgiving       Revolutionary Worker #883, November 24, 1996              Every schoolchild in the U.S. has been taught that the Pilgrims of the       Plymouth Colony invited the local Indians to a major harvest feast       after surviving their first bitter year in New England. But the real       history of Thanksgiving is a story of the murder of indigenous people       and the theft of their land by European colonialists--and of the       ruthless ways of capitalism.       * * * * *              In mid-winter 1620 the English ship Mayflower landed on the North       American coast, delivering 102 Puritan exiles. The original Native       people of this stretch of shoreline had already been killed off. In       1614 a British expedition had landed there. When they left they took       24 Indians as slaves and left smallpox behind. Three years of plague       wiped out between 90 and 96 percent of the inhabitants of the coast,       destroying most villages completely.              The Puritans landed and built their colony called "the Plymouth       Plantation" near the deserted ruins of the Indian village of Pawtuxet.       They ate from abandoned cornfields grown wild. Only one Pawtuxet named       Squanto had survived--he had spent the last years as a slave to the       English and Spanish in Europe. Squanto spoke the colonists' language       and taught them how to plant corn and how to catch fish until the       first harvest. Squanto also helped the colonists negotiate a peace       treaty with the nearby Wampanoag tribe, led by the chief Massasoit.              These were very lucky breaks for the colonists. The first Virginia       settlement had been wiped out before they could establish themselves.       Thanks to the good will of the Wampanoag, the Puritans not only       survived their first year but had an alliance with the Wampanoags that       would give them almost two decades of peace.              John Winthrop, a founder of the Massahusetts Bay colony considered       this wave of illness and death to be a divine miracle. He wrote to a       friend in England, "But for the natives in these parts, God hath so       pursued them, as for 300 miles space the greatest part of them are       swept away by smallpox which still continues among them. So as God       hath thereby cleared our title to this place, those who remain in       these parts, being in all not 50, have put themselves under our       protection."              The deadly impact of European diseases and the good will of the       Wampanoag allowed the Puritans to survive their first year.              In celebration of their good fortune, the colony's governor, William       Bradford, declared a three-day feast of thanksgiving after that first       harvest of 1621.              How the Puritans Stole the Land       But the peace that produced the Thanksgiving Feast of 1621 meant that       the Puritans would have 15 years to establish a firm foothold on the       coast. Until 1629 there were no more than 300 Puritans in New England,       scattered in small and isolated settlements. But their survival       inspired a wave of Puritan invasion that soon established growing       Massachusetts towns north of Plymouth: Boston and Salem. For 10 years,       boatloads of new settlers came.              And as the number of Europeans increased, they proved not nearly so       generous as the Wampanoags.              On arrival, the Puritans discussed "who legally owns all this land."       They had to decide this, not just because of Anglo-Saxon traditions,       but because their particular way of farming was based on individual--       not communal or tribal--ownership. This debate over land ownership       reveals that bourgeois "rule of law" does not mean "protect the rights       of the masses of people."              Some Puritans argued that the land belonged to the Indians. These       forces were excommunicated and expelled. Massachusetts Governor       Winthrop declared the Indians had not "subdued" the land, and       therefore all uncultivated lands should, according to English Common       Law, be considered "public domain." This meant they belonged to the       king. In short, the colonists decided they did not need to consult the       Indians when they seized new lands, they only had to consult the       representative of the crown (meaning the local governor).              The Puritans embraced a line from Psalms 2:8. "Ask of me, and I shall       give thee, the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts       of the earth for thy possession." Since then, European settler states       have similarly declared god their real estate agent: from the Boers       seizing South Africa to the Zionists seizing Palestine.              The European immigrants took land and enslaved Indians to help them       farm it. By 1637 there were about 2,000 British settlers. They pushed       out from the coast and decided to remove the inhabitants.              The Birth of       "The American Way of War"       In the Connecticut Valley, the powerful Pequot tribe had not entered       an alliance with the British (as had the Narragansett, the Wampanoag,       and the Massachusetts peoples). At first they were far from the       centers of colonization. Then, in 1633, the British stole the land       where the city of Hartford now sits--land which the Pequot had       recently conquered from another tribe. That same year two British       slave raiders were killed. The colonists demanded that the Indians who       killed the slavers be turned over. The Pequot refused.              The Puritan preachers said, from Romans 13:2, "Whosoever therefore       resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that       resist shall receive to themselves damnation." The colonial       governments gathered an armed force of 240 under the command of John       Mason. They were joined by a thousand Narragansett warriors. The       historian Francis Jennings writes: "Mason proposed to avoid attacking       Pequot warriors which would have overtaxed his unseasoned, unreliable       troops. Battle, as such, was not his purpose. Battle is only one of       the ways to destroy an enemy's will to fight. Massacre can accomplish       the same end with less risk, and Mason had determined that massacre       would be his objective."              The colonist army surrounded a fortified Pequot village on the Mystic       River. At sunrise, as the inhabitants slept, the Puritan soldiers set       the village on fire.              William Bradford, Governor of Plymouth, wrote: "Those that escaped the       fire were slain with the sword; some hewed to pieces, others run       through with their rapiers, so that they were quickly dispatched and       very few escaped. It was conceived they thus destroyed about 400 at       this time. It was a fearful sight to see them thus frying in the       fire...horrible was the stink and scent thereof, but the victory       seemed a sweet sacrifice, and they gave the prayers thereof to God,       who had wrought so wonderfully for them."                     [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca