XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics
From: invalid@invalid.net
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:42:40 -0600, Yoorghis@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:59:53 -0400, Way Back Jack
> wrote:
>
>>You mean the 10% who pay 75% of the taxes?
>
> No, I mean the "10%" who pay only a fraction of taxes on the money
> they make.
Unable to cite them, eh. And if they're tax delinquent, like Timmy
Geithner and a horde of fed. employees, then by all means nail 'em
Meanwhile:
What about the small businessman who is now considered as rich if he
grosses more than $250K?
Or the hard-working married couple who have achieved that level after
beginning life as lower or middle class?
You wanna cripple the corporations that provide goods, services, and jobs
-- yes jobs?
Or maybe you just wanna nail the CEOs and other top execs.
You do know that you could kill all the fat cats, seize their wealth, and
redistribute it to those salivating at getting a free "sail foam," it
would run the goody wagon about 6 months.
You see nothing wrong with Obama making the eagle fly hobnobbing with 1%er
Tiger Woods while playing the sequester card denying WH visits for the
kiddos.
You say we all pay taxes except for those with lowest income. Oh, you mean
the 49% who found it's better to get unlimited unemployment dough, SSI,
Medicaid, food stamps, etc. Like one young Obama groupie who said, "Why
bother to work?"
Fucking moonbat.
> If That "10%'' would pay the taxes levied when jobs, growth,
> innovation, expansion and rising middle class was the BEST---then we'd
> be better off, we could lower taxes on Working people, maintain
> infrastructure, educate a work force better....
>
> Dollar amount is NOT a relevant component.
>
> Over 75% of all income and wealth each year is made by 10% of the top.
>
> Their burden (if any at all for some) is minimal.
.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
