From: oldwifetale@yahoo.com   
      
   On Thursday, October 2, 2014 4:56:49 PM UTC-7, yan...@gmail.com wrote:   
   > Hitler? Paul Watson? The FBI has said for 40 years that AIM thought that   
   Anna Mae was an informant and therefore killed her. I didn't think Anna Mae   
   was an informant. No one I knew thought she was an informant. If AIM wasn't   
   saying that she was an    
   informant then who was?   
      
   Actually, i think those are good questions. (surprise!) I'm accepting of the   
   verdict, but not so much the motive or who really set it in motion.   
      
   However, why *wouldn't* they (FBI) say that? It does seem like the most   
   obvious motive to someone who believes AIM was behind her murder (and/or the   
   order for her to be murdered). I guess no one wants to think there was a third   
   party anywhere.   
      
   Is it an accepted fact or conclusion that the motive had to be that she was   
   suspected of being an informant? I don't know, i'm asking.   
      
   I also read on wikipedia the other day that Anna May was becoming influential   
   in shaping AIM policies and programs before she died. That's a big deal.   
   Policy determines the future of any organization. Wikipedia's not the best   
   reference site, i know, but    
   it's good for the little reminders.    
      
   Durham was outed as an FBI informant, and *he* was only *exiled*.    
      
   And what about the way she was killed?   
   Who does that?    
   Who would say, "This is how it needs to be done."   
      
   I don't know, just thinking out loud.   
      
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_by_shooting   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)