From: oldwifetale@yahoo.com   
      
   On Sunday, October 5, 2014 12:11:03 PM UTC-7, yan...@gmail.com wrote:   
   > On Thursday, October 2, 2014 4:56:49 PM UTC-7, yan...@gmail.com wrote:   
   >    
   > > Hitler? Paul Watson? The FBI has said for 40 years that AIM thought that   
   Anna Mae was an informant and therefore killed her. I didn't think Anna Mae   
   was an informant. No one I knew thought she was an informant. If AIM wasn't   
   saying that she was an    
   informant then who was?   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > I took another look at the Anna Mae site on Wikipedia. It's still the FBI   
   crap channeled throutgh Demain. It is no longer in demains famous foam at the   
   mouth journalistic style. One of his staff must have polished it up. What's   
   not said is as    
   significant as what is said. There are descriptions of three different girls.   
   The one found at the crime scene, she was about 20 years old and was poss   
      
   I agree, it does seem incomplete. I took a look at it again too, and there's a   
   section where information can be edited or added if it's verified or   
   verifiable. Also there's a tab for viewing the history of information that's   
   been added, by who, and    
   regarding what's been rejected or accepted.    
      
   I saw editorial arguments against anyone pushing a Point Of View (POV), so it   
   does seem like they're at least attempting to maintain a standard of   
   presenting non-biased facts.   
      
   Regarding the descriptions of other girls, if that could be verified, it   
   should be there as well. At the very least, it could be listed under the   
   category of 'controversies'. I see that all the time on other wikipedia   
   subjects. No valid information    
   should be dismissed just because it points this way or that way.   
      
   It would be good to see all the verifiable facts there.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)