home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.native      Pretty sure excluding the pilgrims      29,288 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 27,999 of 29,288   
   oldwifetale to yan...@gmail.com   
   Re: Who said that a lie repeated often e   
   09 Oct 14 06:16:59   
   
   From: oldwifetale@yahoo.com   
      
   On Wednesday, October 8, 2014 3:05:08 PM UTC-7, yan...@gmail.com wrote:   
   > On Thursday, October 2, 2014 4:56:49 PM UTC-7, yan...@gmail.com wrote:   
   >    
   > > Hitler? Paul Watson? The FBI has said for 40 years that AIM thought that   
   Anna Mae was an informant and therefore killed her. I didn't think Anna Mae   
   was an informant. No one I knew thought she was an informant. If AIM wasn't   
   saying that she was an    
   informant then who was?   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   > This case stinks to high heaven. The FBI wasn't required to verify facts.   
   There were no witnesses to the FBI story. No evidence either. Yet Arlo was   
   convicted and sentenced to life, without evidence or witnesses. Just hearsay.   
   The three different girls    
   are referenced in Hendricks voluminous footnotes. Dors it matter in a case   
   built on lies?   
      
      
   Which parts do you think are lies, and what's the story about the three girls   
   who were referenced? I'm not being sarcastic, i just don't precisely remember.   
   A mix-up, problems in making an identification or something like that? Were   
   other girls missing    
   in the area? I think details like that are important when trying to find the   
   truth of a matter. Everything is.   
      
   On the other hand, if one is trying to build a case for either the FBI or AIM,   
   or even for "political prisoners" - or to build a case, period - it doesn't   
   actually leave one open to seeing all possibilities that might exist. It's   
   like looking for truth    
   with blinders on.   
      
   You say that the FBI had no verifiable facts, and that no one in AIM thought   
   Anna Mae was an informant, yet i think that's not really so. Anna Mae's   
   daughter outlined her perspective of that, and it's very different from your   
   perspective.    
      
   http://jfamr.org/denise_interview.html   
      
   How is it really educating people when only one perspective is ever provided,   
   presented as the only absolute unquestionable truth?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca