Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.native    |    Pretty sure excluding the pilgrims    |    29,288 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 27,999 of 29,288    |
|    oldwifetale to yan...@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Who said that a lie repeated often e    |
|    09 Oct 14 06:16:59    |
      From: oldwifetale@yahoo.com              On Wednesday, October 8, 2014 3:05:08 PM UTC-7, yan...@gmail.com wrote:       > On Thursday, October 2, 2014 4:56:49 PM UTC-7, yan...@gmail.com wrote:       >        > > Hitler? Paul Watson? The FBI has said for 40 years that AIM thought that       Anna Mae was an informant and therefore killed her. I didn't think Anna Mae       was an informant. No one I knew thought she was an informant. If AIM wasn't       saying that she was an        informant then who was?       >        >        >        > This case stinks to high heaven. The FBI wasn't required to verify facts.       There were no witnesses to the FBI story. No evidence either. Yet Arlo was       convicted and sentenced to life, without evidence or witnesses. Just hearsay.       The three different girls        are referenced in Hendricks voluminous footnotes. Dors it matter in a case       built on lies?                     Which parts do you think are lies, and what's the story about the three girls       who were referenced? I'm not being sarcastic, i just don't precisely remember.       A mix-up, problems in making an identification or something like that? Were       other girls missing        in the area? I think details like that are important when trying to find the       truth of a matter. Everything is.              On the other hand, if one is trying to build a case for either the FBI or AIM,       or even for "political prisoners" - or to build a case, period - it doesn't       actually leave one open to seeing all possibilities that might exist. It's       like looking for truth        with blinders on.              You say that the FBI had no verifiable facts, and that no one in AIM thought       Anna Mae was an informant, yet i think that's not really so. Anna Mae's       daughter outlined her perspective of that, and it's very different from your       perspective.               http://jfamr.org/denise_interview.html              How is it really educating people when only one perspective is ever provided,       presented as the only absolute unquestionable truth?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca