XPost: alt.nl.gaycafe, alt.non.sequitur, alt.nudist   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: fredp151@gmail.com   
      
   On 2016-08-25 10:10:31 +0000, Ubiquitous  said:   
      
   > In article , fredp151@gmail.com wrote:   
   >> On 2016-08-25 06:43:06 +0000, "Liar Hillary Clinton Needs To Go To   
   >> Jail"  said:   
   >   
   >>> The Supreme Court unanimously overturned former Virginia   
   >>> governor Robert F. McDonnell’s public-corruption conviction   
   >>> Monday and imposed higher standards for federal prosecutors who   
   >>> charge public officials with wrongdoing.   
   >>   
   >> But you want to jail Hillary for just the appearance of "pay for pay".   
   >   
   > Strawman noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.   
      
   There is no argument necessary.  There is no evidence of any "pay for   
   play", nor was anything illegal done.   
      
   You can bleat and bray about it like a garden variety jackass...   
   nothing is going to change the facts - and even your beloved Fox News   
   Favorite Frauds agree.   
      
   > Fox's Brett Baier :  Where is the line of the quid pro quo? Is paying   
   > millions to the foundation in order to get a meeting with the secretary   
   > before she leaves for Israel and you actually get it, to talk about   
   > Israeli policy, is that the level of quid pro quo? Does that get there?   
   >   
   > Krauthammer: Technically speaking, if you were a lawyer, you would say   
   > no. All of it is the giving of a favor. The meeting, in and of itself,   
   > is the giving of a favor. However, historically, in our system and   
   > everywhere, people give money to campaigns. Why do they give it? Out of   
   > the goodness of their heart?   
   >   
   > The point of giving money is to get access. We accept that in our   
   > campaigns. We accept it everywhere. If access were considered a quid   
   > pro quo, jails would be groaning with politicians.   
   >   
   > http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/439289/krauthammer-clinto   
   -foundation-corruption-damning-though-not-illegal   
      
   Sorry   
   >   
   about that, fuckface...  but when even Fox admits there was no quid pro   
   quo, you KNOW you've got no leg to stand on.   
   --   
   "Did you ever think that making a speech on Economics is a lot like   
   pissing down your leg? It seems hot to you, but it never does to anyone   
   else." -LBJ   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)