From: ir@ene.nu   
      
   On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:58:25 -0800, "Dimitar Bojantchev"   
    wrote:   
      
      
   >You know Irene, let's just call it I. grammata. I forgot what you   
   >suggested because the name is totally new to me, then looked around on   
   >my own, saw I. grammata, came back and see that's exactly what you   
   >suggested.  And that's the closest, visually. Re-measured the spores,   
   >well I'll revise that to 6.2-6.7 x 5.5-6.2 because I didn't quite   
   >measure the diagonal length, but all of the wishful thinking couldn't   
   >help me see the size of up to 8 m (from Roger Phillips' book). And   
   >considering that I'm not paid to do that, well, I'm satisfied (for   
   >now).   
      
   As you said - close, but maybe not close enough. I'd go for "Inocybe   
   cf grammata".   
      
   >Now can I pass you the other 60 specimens I haven't ID-ed yet?   
   >Actually I'll work them up to a point because it's so easy to get   
   >lazy.  Although that right now I find more than I can process...   
      
   Here we have a long winter ahead - which started about a month ago, so   
   it would be nice to watch your pictures, once you find time to upload   
   them... I can't hope to be able to identify much of it, though.   
   I beleive most of the californian species are different from the   
   european ones.   
      
   Irene Andersson   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)