home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.nature.mushrooms      Well I guess its one way to go natural      3,983 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,585 of 3,983   
   Kurt to Irene Andersson   
   snobby   
   29 Jul 06 12:57:27   
   
   From: norsgerm@a...........   
      
   I hope you folks don't think I'm snobby, but I just got a 256MB card (ya,   
   Quee, I'm sure yours is bigger)  for my 'autofricus' camera. Now I can take   
   more out of focus pictures while searching for the 'gems'.   
   Good to have your discussion going, and there is so much potential with   
   digital cameras.   
   I had a Sharp View Cam years ago and miss moving pictures. I captured frames   
   (low res of course) good enough for the PC. The sound adds so much, like   
   hearing a catapillar crawl accross gravel, which I only realized at   
   playback.   
   Kurt   
   These little cameras movie feature is not to thrilling.   
   "Irene Andersson"  wrote in message   
   news:jl5nc215o5mb43idpavj5ni0e9fr15v8ag@4ax.com...   
   > On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 11:08:16 -0400, Frederick Burroughs   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >>Irene Andersson wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> The best thing with the digital camera is that it doesn't cost a   
   >>> fortune to make errors anymore, when it's possible to make experiments   
   >>> and explore it with unlimited amounts of pictures with instant   
   >>> results. The only limit is the time..   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>Indeed. The best HDR results from combining many exposures. My camera   
   >>will do a set of 5 exposures in bracket mode. More professional cameras   
   >>can take more; the more the better. Combining 5 film exposures in a   
   >>darkroom would take all day. Not to mention preparation and clean up   
   >>time, chemical, paper and film costs... A digital camera and computer   
   >>can do it in minutes. This technique has really rekindled my interest in   
   >>photography.   
   >   
   > From what I have seen in your photos, HDR must be excellent for   
   > mushrooms, where I often get over- and/or underexposed parts - and I   
   > also prefer photos without flash.   
   > I saw there was a free trial software - just have to try it soon.   
   > I suppose that is the one that adds the letters Photomatix to the   
   > picture, but never mind..   
   > First, however, I must check how the camera manages multiple photos   
   > and how to set the exposure for them.   
   > I will tell when I have a result worth showing :-)   
   >   
   > Irene Andersson   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca