From: dimitar@pontix.com   
      
   "jill"  wrote in message   
   news:1156529255.629542.79630@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...   
   > Never mind DB, and excuse the he double hockey sticks out of me. I have   
   > to disagree  and say it was rude of you with the all encompassing "you   
   > could get at least one photo not blurred beyond recognizance"  They are   
   > not that bad, the bigger pics are avail if one clicks on the   
      
   Jill, this wasn't intended as a snotty remark. I make such remarks   
   sparingly and only because I feel that I do good. I feel offended when   
   people know better, but don't tell me the truth, thus prolonging my   
   ignorance on some subject...   
      
   > thumbnails.This is what I can afford, no I can't afford to be paying   
   > for a site so some quality will be lost in reducing jpegs, and I was   
   > hoping having all the pics in one place would help others also in id's   
   > (I was being nice, see how well it did not work?) Very few things in   
   > this world are all encompassing. These were taken over the past two   
   > years and I cannot retake tham.   
   > anyone else wanna bash all my work?   
   > I'll ask again, anyone else:   
   > I am wondering most specifically about the ones with the rulers near   
   > them...I think one is rare V bombycina (spores salmon)and the others   
   > agaricus (brown spores), and the redorange tinted, white spores (which   
   > was bruised by rain) Amanita, and will be glad to add more details as   
   > needed if there are questions   
      
   Jill, I think that this one is a Pluteus of some kind. The lignicolous   
   habit strongly suggests that. I am not sure that I see a volva   
   either. All in all, it could be anything, but I do not think that   
   there is enough evidence to suggest Volvariella.   
      
   Regards,   
      
           Dimitar   
      
      
   >   
   > Dimitar Bojantchev wrote:   
   >> "jill"  wrote in message   
   >> news:1156467373.228940.277060@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...   
   >> >I have a bunch of unidentifieds in my photoblog,   
   >> > http://img63.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=1346gd2.jpg   
   >> >   
   >> > could someone please help with the ones I have not named? I'm pretty   
   >> > sure the ones named are correct, but there are a bunch I really don't   
   >> > want to chance. The dated picz are the newest   
   >> > jill   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Jill, eating them and not/reporting the results would help with the   
   >> id. But what will help the most is if you could get at least one photo   
   >> not blurred beyond recognizance. It's safer to start there.   
   >>   
   >>         D.   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)