Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.nature.mushrooms    |    Well I guess its one way to go natural    |    3,983 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,421 of 3,983    |
|    riburr to Rusty Hinge    |
|    Re: Fall finds (Hygrophorus fuligineus c    |
|    03 Dec 10 06:01:12    |
      From: riburr@shentel.net              Rusty Hinge wrote:       >       > Just obtained a cheapo Tasco microscope from an Oxfam charity shop in       > Norwich - 50x - 1200x magnification, one pound ninety pence - not a lot       > lost if it's as bad as its red plastic body and chrome-coloured plastic       > twidlybits have prepared me for it being.       >       > I'm hoping it will be good enough to look at spores - until I can fin a       > nice heavy one with good lenses.       >              What's a good magnification and resolution for mushroom spore viewing?       Benjamin, in his book "Mushrooms: poisons and panaceas," recommends oil       immersion, 1000-1600X. This magnification is required as an aid to a       medical diagnosis where mushroom poisoning is suspected, and spores from       the mushrooms consumed are available.              Size and shape of mushroom spores are roughly equal to human red blood       cells (6-8µm), but you need to resolve smaller then this to view spore       ornamentation. would you use an etched cover slip to determine spore       dimensions?              --       Mushroom blog:       http://ftvmushrooms.blogspot.com              The adpReview blog is being revised.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca