Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.netscape    |    Ahh the beloved Netscrape Crashigator    |    5,620 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 5,588 of 5,620    |
|    Netscape Guy to All    |
|    Re: Use of alternate e-mail port (995 in    |
|    20 May 08 09:38:28    |
      From: Netscape@Guy.com              "Moz Champion (Dan)" wrote:              > > But where are the reports of vulnerabilities to Netscape 4.x       > > (or 7.x) during the time-frame when those versions were current?       >       > Why ask me?              I'm asking *this newsgroup*.              I'm asking because there were claims made here that Netscape 4.x has       vulnerabilities.              You've made the claim that it has *dozens* of vulnerabilities. Why       are you reluctant to point to a source describing them?              > Why don't you go to the CERT sites and look them up?              You could do the same and post the resulting URL's.              > Why would anyone KEEP such reports when the software is no       > longer supportted?              Why would anyone get rid of old documents or web-content?              It costs essentially nothing to archive old material and make them       available on the net. Be they old usenet postings, old versions of       entire web sites or URL's, etc.              Your continued references to netscape being out-of-support is       specious. I am not arguing about or questioning it's support status.              I am seeking information regarding vulnerabilities it was known to       have - or claimed to have.              > > So again I ask:       > >       > > What documented e-mail handling or usenet news-reading/posting       > > vulnerabilities does Netscape 4.7x have?       >       > Dozens of such. Look in the archives for them.              Your statement is nothing but heresay unless you can provide some       shread of evidence for these vulnerabilities.              Even just a basic description or title or name of one vulnerability       would provide a starting point for a web search.              > It is a non-supportted application tho,       > and any vulnerabilities will not be addressed.              I am not arguing or discussing those points.              Why do you keep bringing them up?              > Whether or not they affect Netscape Communicator 4x is unknown,       > because no one is testing it any longer!              So you are speculating that 4.x has vulnerabilities - as I thought.              Just a lot of hot air from you.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca