From: davidc@wa-wd.com
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 01:55:35 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
wrote:
>David Carson wrote:
>>On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 21:24:29 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>David Carson wrote:
>>>>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:10:24 -0000 (UTC), Mark Shaw :
>>>>>>>I don't see how illegality and violence makes a business not a
>>>>>>>business. But then again IANAL, so who knows?
>>>
>>>>It was an honest mistake that anyone could have made. There are the
>>>>dictionaries that are published for everyone to use, that are compiled
>>>>by professional linguists, and those agree with you. But they are no
>>>>match for the dictionary that floats around in Adam H. Kerman's head.
>>>
>>>Ooo, another LLM hallucination by the formerly legitimate poster known
>>>as David Carson. Let's note that neither the dictionaries nor linguists
>>>exist.
>>
>>I note that I became illegitimate at about the same time as I stopped
>>taking Adam H. Kerman serioiusly. What a coincidence.
>
>Well, no. It was when you posterd that specific bit of nonsense. It was
>action you took that had nothing to do with me.
Oh, it was all about you, baby. *You* made not one, not two, but THREE
posts correcting someone else's word usage, when there was nothing
wrong with his usage. I pointed out that *you* were the one in the
wrong. After that, *you* stopped trying to foist *your* own incorrect,
idiosyncratic definition of the word "business" into this thread.
*You* gave up on that debate and pivoted to complaining about my
treatment of *you.* Mission accomplished.
Yeah, in the past, I would have responded without making a personal
dig at you from the get-go. And then we would have exchanged three to
five non-personal replies until you told me to go fuck myself. But
I've found this new way of dealing with your errors to be way more
effective. Get used to it.
David Carson
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
