From: INVALID_SEE_SIG@example.com.invalid   
      
   In the previous article, Adam H. Kerman  wrote:   
   > >>I wonder why he's unconcerned about the two political assasinations   
   > >>and two attempted murders in Minnesota, within the last three   
   > >>months.   
   >   
   > >They weren't political assassinations, is probably why. The shooter   
   > >of the two legislators was pretty obviously a lunatic. Also note   
   > >that no one cheered him on.   
   >   
   > He had a lengthy list of politicians on his kill list, and there were   
   > plenty of suggestions that it was in reaction to recent votes.   
      
   He also said Tim Walz was beaming coded messages to him or something.   
      
   > I don't know what your point is.   
      
   My point is that there is a fundamental difference between a lunatic   
   murdering someone out of delusion and someone murdering someone to   
   silence his political speech. Both are bad. One is worse.   
      
   > >>>    In the case of Thompson, we were made to endure weeks of   
   > >>>    healthcare discourse, not only by otherwise "reasonable"   
   > >>>    left-wing talking heads, but sitting politicians like AOC and   
   > >>>    Warren. Hasan Piker, who called Luigi "based," has been   
   > >>>    characterized by the press, with glowing editorials, as the   
   > >>>    future of the left for months.   
   >   
   > >>I don't know what "based" means, and there were no "glowing   
   > >>editorials" in favor of murder.   
   >   
   > >The "glowing editorials" referred to the press's treatment of a man   
   > >(Piker) who had praised murder.   
   >   
   > Lacking a citation, it's still bullshit. It's a straw man to rail   
   > against unnamed enemies, not a point of debate.   
      
   Why do you need "a citation" when the quote is right there in front of   
   you?   
   --   
   jd   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)