Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.old-west    |    Discussing the wild west, frontier life    |    1,275 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 523 of 1,275    |
|    Gerald Clough to Cineshock    |
|    Re: Difference between marshals and cons    |
|    06 May 04 17:55:02    |
      From: firstinitiallastname@texas.net              Cineshock wrote:              > Were town marshals in the West typically elected or appointed? City       constables       > (or chiefs) were appointed while county sheriffs were elected, right?              Depends on where you might be. Town marshals might be elected or hired.       Likewise, city constables. Various states use different titles, and       within one state, different types of cities (four different types in       Texas) may operate under different rules.              In Texas, each precinct within a county has an elected constable, an       indepenant head of agency, even if an it's often an agency of one       officer. Cities may appoint police officers. Some classes of city may       appoint marshals, who generall serve writs and warrants but who are full       peace officers. In a Class B General Law City, the Marshal is also the       tax assessor/collector. Cities may also appoint watchmen, who are not       peace officers. (A lot of cities had only a watchman in the first half       of the 20th century, there being little crime in small towns, and the       Sheriff took care of what there was.) The mayor of a Type A General Law       City may appoint special police.              This is current law but hasn't changed much for a long time, but in the       19th century, town marshals and town constables were frquently elected.       As time went by, cities began abolishing the elected office of town       marshal, conferring most of his duties on the police. Not all were       elected. San Antonio appointed its town marshals, and duties included       shooting stray dogs and picking up trash. Usually the lowest paid city       employee.              In 1856, San Antonio divided the city into precincts to be patrolled by       volunteer citizens to try to keep down robbery and murder. In 1875, the       Marshal got a uniformed force, although they were required to keep their       pistols concealed under their uniform coats. They were titled "police",       rather than deputy marshals. The marshal's title changed to Chief of       Police in 1911. Things got formal after that. Police had to shave every       day, could not smoke before 11pm and could not sit while on duty.              In Texas, Sheriff has always been an elected office, although during       reconstruction, the Yankee military governor frequently tossed out the       sheriff when he refused the oath of allegiance and appointed another.       They often ran through quite a few before they found a taker.              In the territories, US Marshals were the defacto lawmen, although a       number complained that they had little idea what laws were to be       enforced, how and how much they were to be paid and how to deal with the       frequent evaporation of courts when judges moved on out of the territory.              --        Gerald Clough        "Nothing has any value, unless you know you can give it up."              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca