From: russell-watson@att.net   
      
   On 28 Jul 2003 05:39:30 -0600, howD@dontemailme.com (Gud Nabor) wrote:   
      
   >In article , aerohip@telus.net   
   >says...   
   >   
   >   
   >>And I read that Costner will NOT be in this Sequel.   
   >   
   >The theater near my home shows 'firt run'   
   >movies on three screens. Recently its been   
   >hard to find a title on the marquee that   
   >doesn't have II or III in the title. I'm   
   >wondering if there has ever been a IV?   
   >   
   >And no, Quo Vadis IV doesn't count.   
      
   "Superman IV: the Quest for Peace" (1987)   
   "Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home" (1986)   
   There was also a V & VI in the Star Trek series. Once they switched   
   from the original crew to "Next Generation" they dropped the number   
   scheme and went with titles only.   
   Those were just 2 off the top of my head. A search for movies with the   
   Roman Numeral 4 (IV) in the title turned up 154 entries on IMDb,   
   though a few denoted something other than the 4th film in a series   
   (like Henry IV) or were alternate titles to films better known by   
   other names.   
   There was just a discussion on one of the news networks last night   
   about how badly most of the movies released this summer have dropped   
   off at the box office after the first weekend, and the number of   
   sequels was cited as a contributing factor.   
   BTW, what is "Quo Vadis IV"? Couldn't find a listing for movie with   
   that title, though there are 11 listed with "Quo Vadis" in the title.   
   Are you maybe confusing "Quo Vadis" with "QB VII" based on the Leon   
   Uris novel of the same name?   
   '97 FLSTF   
   To reply by e-mail, remove nospam from address.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)