From: russell-watson@att.net   
      
   On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 21:35:52 -0500, "Shashay Doofray"   
    wrote:   
      
   >Russell Watson  wrote in message   
   >news:qgk3jvshhghkrnvqmrjriunpg2rkhcps88@4ax.com...   
   >> So, after 2 episodes, what is the consensus of the folks here about   
   >> this new TV show?   
   >> I personally don't think it's a great show, but it ain't the worst   
   >> that ever been on either. Not sure if they have all their ducks in a   
   >> row on their history. It appears to be set around 1900 (I believe the   
   >> headstone on the grave in tonight's ep said "Died 1899") but I don't   
   >> know how much of what they've shown on there so far actually existed   
   >> then.   
   >> '97 FLSTF   
   >> To reply by e-mail, remove nospam from address.   
   >   
   >   
   >TV is a complete waste of time.   
   >   
   >SD   
   >   
      
   While dropping in on internet discussion groups to make such comments   
   is a very constructive use of it....   
   On average I have to agree with you, though. I personally spend about   
   20% of the supposed national average time each person spends on it,   
   and the majority of that is spent watching the History Channel,   
   Discovery Channel, A&E, etc. I average about 3 hours a week of all   
   other TV combined. One exception is westerns. If one is on, either a   
   series or movie, I'll usually watch it. For the most part, given my   
   'druthers, I'll read a book. I also tend to watch less TV when home   
   alone than when my wife is here. Go figure...   
   '97 FLSTF   
   To reply by e-mail, remove nospam from address.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)