Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.beos    |    Underrated early 90's OS, sad it died...    |    1,512 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,128 of 1,512    |
|    TheLetterK to Andrew J. Brehm    |
|    Re: Is Linux the Next BEOS or OS/2?    |
|    28 Aug 05 13:04:07    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.os2.advocacy       From: theletterk@nomail.spymac.com              Andrew J. Brehm wrote:       > Linønut <=?iso-8859-1?Q?lin=F8nut?=@bone.com> wrote:       >       >       >>Andrew J. Brehm poked his little head through the XP firewall and said:       >>       >>       >>>>No marketing, impossible to get OEM deals due to Microsoft's illegal       >>>>business practices, etc.       >>>       >>>Do you know anybody who tries to buy a computer without Windows and       >>>can't?       >>       >>That's not the point.       >       >       > I believe it is the point. Most people want a Windows computer and can       > buy it.       They want a Windows system because everyone else gets it by default, and       they get it by default because they want it. It's circular reasoning.              > Those who don't want a Windows computer can buy a computer       > without Windows. Whether the supply of Windows computers is greater than       > the splly of non-Windows computers doesn't matter, as the supply matches       > the demand.       This isn't the point. The fact that Microsoft has illegally locked       companies into using Windows *to the exclusion of all else* means the       market is no longer a level playing field.              >       > If there is demand for non-Windows computer, there will be a supply of       > such.       People didn't realize they wanted a GPS system in their car back in       1990. Did that mean the demand wasn't there? No.              >       >       >>A technical user, whether it be of souped-up cars       >>or souped-up computers, can always find a path to what he/she wants in a       >>niche market. The average user, even if they know of the niche market,       >>do not have the savvy or the desire to work out how to use the       >>niche market to their advantage.       >       >       > The average user isn't looking for an incompatible computer. The average       > computer needs a random computer to be compatible with the largest       > selection of other random computers.       GNU/Linux is fully compatible with Windows boxes. But not Windows       applications. You can share data and interoperate just fine.              >       >       >>The point is that Microsoft has forced all other OS vendors into the       >>niche market.       >       >       > The customers have forced all other OS vendors into the niche market.       No they haven't. Microsoft illegally forced this. This was proven in a       court of law.              > Operating systems rely on the network effect to become most valuable.       > More than one standard is simply not efficient and will be rejected by       > most customers.       >       > Most customers do not want a non-standard PC.       Your right--the problem is that Microsoft defined 'standard', not the       customers.              >       >       >>That way, they can provide the default solution with       >>absolutely no competition.       >       >       > That is in the interest of the average customer.       No it's not. Their interest lies in open standards, so they can pick       whatever the hell they want.              > In contrast to what the       > techical people think, most people are not interested in figuring out       > what software to buy and comparing operating systems. For the there is       > hardware and software, and the first is required to use the second. They       > do not want (or need) more than one hardware platform or more than one       > software platform.       >       > The ideal solution would be commodity operating systems, with several       > vedors implementing the same compatibility standard. Unix and Linux do       > that, but customers rejected the standard and bought DOS and then       > Windows instead.       Customers didn't have a choice in the matter. Microsoft illegally       claimed the market before Linux even existed.              >       >       >>And the current U.S. administration told the D.O.J., "Hands off".       >       >       > And I suppose that is wrong because you disagree with the decision?       >       >              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca