Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.beos    |    Underrated early 90's OS, sad it died...    |    1,512 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,137 of 1,512    |
|    steve to linux-sux    |
|    Re: Is Linux the Next BEOS or OS/2?    |
|    29 Aug 05 10:33:56    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.os2.advocacy       From: steve@nospam.invalid              On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:55:40 -0700, linux-sux wrote:              >       > The Anthill Mob wrote:       >> Face it Linux has had more than enough time to make it's presence known       >> as a desktop system and it has failed miserably. THird world countries       >> and a handful of minor companies don;t even put a ping in Microsoft's       >> market.       >>       >> So I ask, is Linux desktop headed for extinction like BEOS and OS/2 both       >> of which were superior to Windows.       >>       >> Linux is free, supports a fair amount of hardware and includes a ton of       >> free programs so why isn't anyone interested? Common sense would dictate       >> Linux would steamroll Microsoft, yet Linux remains a virtual unknown       >> amongst average Jane. Why?       >> Maybe because it sucks and the public is not interested?       >>       >>       >>       >>       > no. linux isn't the next beos or os2. linux sucks much worse than either       > one of those.              I take it you have used all three and you can give comparative examples.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca