XPost: alt.flame, alt.os.linux
From: fart_deco@127.0.0.1
Stephen Edwards wrote:
> NunYa Bidness wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:26:36 -0500, GANEFS! Gave
>> us:
>
> 8< SNIP >8
>
>>>>That would be the baseline
>>>>criteria here.
>>>
>>>ROFL
>>
>>
>> What? Does BeOS run on VMS' hardware?
>
> Now. He's laughing at you, because you don't get it, and
> you probably never will.
...yeah, that too. :]
>
>>>> BTW, there are plenty of OSes that beat the pants off of VMS.
>>>
>>>What, exactly, is your criteria for this?
>>
>>
>> Any number of factors could be considered. Hell the new Xbox 360
>> likely destroys it. Whoopie doo, it's got a nice big backplane for
>> peripheral cards! Oh boy... THAT's hardware.
>>
>>
>>>I could easily charge someone upwards of $200/hr to fix their antique
>>>backend VMS system running some custom app that was easier to keep running
>>>than hire code-monkeys to recreate.
>>
>>
>> So what. Any good engineer can tally that many bananas that fast.
>> You are not special, son.
>>
>>
>>> In that respect, VMS/VAX is "tha shiznit", imo.
>>
>>
>> Nice opinion, but the "pwns" and "bit-chess" is more than fairly
>> immature and even more than fairly lame in Usenet, as it nearly always
>> means a troll.
>
> Unlike your posts, which are meaningful, and informative.
>
>
>>>it does what it was meant to do so well that people still use it after
>>>several
>>>decades. what better argument is there, ya know? sheesh.
>>
>>
>> Fine. Fine opinion. Again, it was the added CRAP that makes the
>> whole declaration, and you look bad.
>>
>>
>>>> Since
>>>>you have spanned hardware platforms, I could also easily and correctly
>>>>contend that there are plenty of hardware platforms that beat the
>>>>pants off it as well. Whom is owned? In this thread, that'd be you.
>>>
>>>the only better hardware platform, historically is probably Z80. :)
>>
>>
>> Your brain must have gotten bent when that black hole ejected you :-]
>
> Uh, do you even know what a Z80 is to begin with? Let me give you a
> hint: it's not a sports car he's referring to.
actually, i *was* talking about my phat ride. i got two bass toobs in the
back for when i pump up teh jamz, mang.
>
>>>> Sheesh. Troll boy acts all intelligent, then utilizes lame, gang boy
>>>>net lingo. How mature... NOT!
>>>
>>>you just wait until my crew comes in to back me up, yo. you'll be eating
>>>those words, mang.
>>
>>
>> Yep, mosh pit punk material... E-1 grade.
>> Your posted "e-mail addy" fits you.
>>
>> If you do not know that there are much better computers running much
>> better OSes out there today, then you have been inside for too long
>> since your discharge.
>
> Coming from a person who probably still needs help from his mother to
> get dressed. It baffles my mind how people such as yourself manage to
> figure out how to use their USENET clients.
i assumed that someone/something else was transposing the babbly-ing on their
behalf. perhaps some voice-to-text program?
--
Roberta "Foxymopjockeychickenwrist" Wolfe
"The talk of the sekret AUK
off-newsgroup listserves!"
>>>>> Hmmmmmm. Is this the Mop Jockey or Alexa?
>>>> Moppy.
>>>Are you sure? It had an Alexa/babaloonie addy (one or the other, I
>>>forget which now)...
>> mop jockey started the "Fart Deco" froggery, which was then adopted by
>> the oh_brutha20002 sockpuppet machine/fanboi. "FArt Deco" is/was
>> oh_brutha.
> Right, right...I still contend, however, that Alexa is the most likely
> candidate for the wearer of the oh_brutha/babaloonie sock, simply because
> the style resembles hers quite closely (IMO), posting through Google while
> also using a newsreader (Agent 2.0) is easy enough, and oh_brutha seems to
> be going after some of Alexa's favourite targets with much the same
> attitude as whereisthemoney.org. Plus, of course, she [isn't] happy if
> she isn't socking-up all the time...
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
