Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.beos    |    Underrated early 90's OS, sad it died...    |    1,512 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 836 of 1,512    |
|    Rick to imouttahere    |
|    Re: OsX compared to Linux and BeOS    |
|    13 Feb 05 01:36:17    |
      XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, alt.os.linux.mandrake, comp.os.linux.advocacy       XPost: alt.os.linux.redhat       From: none@trollfeed.com              On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:11:54 -0800, imouttahere wrote:              >>GNOME is so simple to use anyone could use it.       >       > That's not quite under dispute. MacOS 6.0 was also simple to use, 15       > years ago. The issue is one of modern functionality.              Are you speaking of Linux?              > How well does the system sleep and wake up?              Well.              > How easy is it to use 802.11, share stuff       > over the network.              Very easy.              > How well does the OS manage power for portables?              Not sure now...       FC 1 does OK on a 5 year old compaq laptop I have.              >       > Macs have the great advantage of having both the OS and hardware       > designed for each other.       > Windows has this to some extent, though of course Microsoft has a hard       > time keeping OEMs in line.       >       > Linux IMV is perpetually wrong-footed in this area, chasing the       > hardware but never quite managing it.              Try another view.              >       > It's be great to have dedicated Linux hardware but this seems counter       > to Linux's least-common-denominator strategy of hardware support.       >       >>I don't get the Linux bashing by Mac people.       >       > Indeed. Apple owes a lot to the GNU/Linux community.       >       > However, we do get sensitive about people making claims that Linux is       > as good as OS X.              .. Linux get sensitive about crap spread by both window$ and Mac users.              >       > For one thing, the linux environment lacks anything as clean as OS X's       > window server, its font rasterizer, multimonitor support, etc.       >       > The Linux community tends to punt the hard problems and then ignore       > them, or, worse, look to what Microsoft has done and slavishly copy       > them.              .... yep, that's the kind of crap Linux users get sensitive about.              >       > Apple pays a lot of people a lot of money to tackle these issues and       > solve them.       >       >> You should be bashing Windows.       >       > We do that too :)              --       Rick              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca