Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.beos    |    Underrated early 90's OS, sad it died...    |    1,512 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 841 of 1,512    |
|    Ruel Smith to Kier    |
|    Re: OsX compared to Linux and BeOS    |
|    13 Feb 05 08:44:56    |
      XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, alt.os.linux.mandrake, comp.os.linux.advocacy       XPost: alt.os.linux.redhat       From: NoWay@NoWhere.com              Kier wrote:              >> if you can stand linux, it would make an okay choice. personally i       >> couldn't. way too fiddly and difficult. every little thing required       >> editing a config file somewhere with tortured, impossible syntax. and       >> all the dependency issues. bleargh, not for me.       >       > You must have been misinformed by someone. It's by no means that hard.       > I've very rarely had to edit a config file, and even when I have, it was       > pretty straightforward. I'm by no means an expert in such matters.              It's pretty common for anyone outside of SuSE users to       edit /etc/X11/XF86Config for their video. However, nVidia publishes a       README on it, and it's very good and straightforward, including all       possible nVidia specific options to enable.              Config and rc files are almost plain english. They're far easier to edit       than the Windows Registry.              >> so that leaves macosx. it's easy to set up and administrate. and yes,       >> it is very stable. i've been using it since 2001, and i've had only two       >> hard crashes in all that time, both years ago. every once in a great       >> while the finder will get confuzzled, but macosx restarts it, and       >> everything is fine again. definitely a good choice for those who cannot       >> in good conscience use microsoft products, which should be everybody, if       >> you ask me.       >       > Yup. But why be confined to Macs, when there's Linux, and FreeBSD, ready       > to go.              On his current machine, even... Macs are great, but they just cost too much       and Apple has forced many owners to upgrade hardware (complete machine) in       order to run the latest/greatest OS. I had a 604e based PowerPC and when       they went to USB and Firewire, they wrote out that ADB bus and instantly       made my machine a dinosaur. They make little to no effort to keep legacy       machines going on the latest software. It sucked that I had a machine just       a couple of years old, but still plenty of power, and I couldn't run Mac OS       9. It's just too expensive to keep up with that crap.              It's too bad, too. I'd probably still be a Mac user if they hadn't done       that. I stuck to the Mac in some of the darkest days, when everyone was       predicting doom for Apple. But, they turned their back on me.                     --              Registered Linux user #378193              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca