XPost: alt.hackers.malicious, alt.2600
From: turdfred@catholic.org
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 14:30:05 GMT, Big Red Helmut
wrote:
>philip taylor wrote in
>:
>
>>Big Red Helmut wrote in message
>news:...
>>> philip taylor wrote in
>>> :
>>>
>>> > Hello All
>>> >
>>> > I am starting up a small company in the uk developing a new
>modernised
>>> > bebox, of course with beos on it.
>>> >
>>> > I need input from as many people interested in this idea to contact
>me
>>> > as possible.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > please either send me an sms or call me on 0044 7986225167
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> >
>>> How much and will you be shipping to the US or other countries?
>>> Good Luck...I fucking hate M$ :)
>>
>>We dont know yet what the cost will be as we still have years of
>>development infront of us. and we do plan to ship worldwide.
>>
>>We need as much input from beos enthusiasts as possible to teach us
>>what users and developers want. please contact as many people as
>>possible, to email me about this subject and others.
>>
>Crossposting into usenet newsgroups with a *larger* readership will
>help.I hear the hackers sometimes use things other than windoze...lets
>alert them :)
>HTH
I used BeOS for several years until thier demise (from release 4 until
death), and was very sad to see it go. If you are talking about what
hardware I'd like to see, basically compatibility with anything out
there. Firewire, USB, DVD, TV etc. Definately dual (or more
processors) and more memory than anyone can stand. The problem with
offering BeOS hardware is of course BeOS it's self. It's easily the
best OS ever made, but hardware support became it's biggest hurdle.
Who buys a computer these days that can't be upgraded? If I were to
buy a Bebox, I would want to be able to upgrade it a year or two after
and know I wouldn't have to deal with less than optimised drivers,
video codecs etc.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
