Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.beos    |    Underrated early 90's OS, sad it died...    |    1,512 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 864 of 1,512    |
|    Timberwoof to imouttahere@mac.com    |
|    Re: OsX compared to Linux and BeOS    |
|    13 Feb 05 18:38:35    |
      XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, alt.os.linux.mandrake, comp.os.linux.advocacy       XPost: alt.os.linux.redhat       From: timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com              In article <1108275114.456562.85170@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,        imouttahere@mac.com wrote:              > >GNOME is so simple to use anyone could use it.       >       > That's not quite under dispute. MacOS 6.0 was also simple to use, 15 years       > ago. The issue is one of modern functionality. How well does the system sleep       > and wake up? How easy is it to use 802.11, share stuff over the network. How       > well does the OS manage power for portables?       >       > Macs have the great advantage of having both the OS and hardware designed for       > each other. Windows has this to some extent, though of course Microsoft has a       > hard time keeping OEMs in line.       >       > Linux IMV is perpetually wrong-footed in this area, chasing the hardware but       > never quite managing it.       >       > It's be great to have dedicated Linux hardware but this seems counter to       > Linux's least-common-denominator strategy of hardware support.       >       > >I don't get the Linux bashing by Mac people.       >       > Indeed. Apple owes a lot to the GNU/Linux community.       >       > However, we do get sensitive about people making claims that Linux is as good       > as OS X.       >       > For one thing, the linux environment lacks anything as clean as OS X's window       > server, its font rasterizer, multimonitor support, etc.       >       > The Linux community tends to punt the hard problems and then ignore them, or,       > worse, look to what Microsoft has done and slavishly copy them.              Well... I think members of the Linux community work on the problems that       interest them. Unfortunately, there's no money to be made in making a really       good gui for Linux. (Look up Easel. Some of those folks are now working on OS       X.)              It seems to me that a lot of Linux and Windows people think that skins are a       good substitute for a fundamentally correct UI.              > Apple pays a lot of people a lot of money to tackle these issues and solve       > them.       >       > > You should be bashing Windows.       >       > We do that too :)              --       Timberwoof |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca