home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.os.beos      Underrated early 90's OS, sad it died...      1,512 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 987 of 1,512   
   TravelinMan to Randy Howard   
   Re: OsX compared to Linux and BeOS   
   27 Apr 05 18:28:18   
   
   XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, alt.os.linux.mandrake, comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   XPost: alt.os.linux.redhat   
   From: Nowhere@spamfree.com   
      
   In article ,   
    Randy Howard  wrote:   
      
   > In article ,   
   > znu@fake.invalid says...   
   > > In article ,   
   > >  Randy Howard  wrote:   
   > >   
   > > > In article ,   
   > > > znu@fake.invalid says...   
   > > > > Dual core will matter to the markets targeted by Xserves and G5 towers.   
   > > >   
   > > > People with a dual-processor box like a G5 tower don't need dual core   
   > > > at all, unless you think that multithreaded apps on the G5 are so   
   > > > slow they need 4 CPUs to get there.   
   > >   
   > > A lot of the tasks for which people buy G5 towers still push the   
   > > capabilities of today's hardware quite a bit. HD video editing, for   
   > > instance. Of course, Apple is trying to unload some of this sort of   
   > > thing on the GPU, but fast processors are still a must. And four fast   
   > > processors (effectively) are better than two.   
   >   
   > True, but I doubt that the majority of people with G5 dual towers are   
   > running high load averages currently.   
      
   Why would the average matter? What matters in determining if a faster   
   system will help is the peak.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca