Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.beos    |    Underrated early 90's OS, sad it died...    |    1,512 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 995 of 1,512    |
|    John Bailo to Afrosheenix    |
|    Re: OsX compared to Linux and BeOS    |
|    27 Apr 05 19:57:14    |
      XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, alt.os.linux.mandrake, comp.os.linux.advocacy       XPost: alt.os.linux.redhat       From: jabailo@texeme.com              Afrosheenix wrote:              > Fact 1. While OSX was still in the works, when Jobs was trying to       > figure out how to blend old code with the NEXT architecture, Apple              You mean sell off his old assets to Apple.              > developed twin systems. Remember Blue Box/Yellow Box/Red Box? Yeah. One       > of those ran natively on x86 hardware.       >       > Fact 2. Apple, at one time, had every intention of shipping Rhapsody       > for x86. Why they didn't is anyone's guess, maybe had something to do              Cool, so I could listen to Sheryl Crow on OSX!              > with the company nearly tanking before the iMac's debut and the return       > of Insanely Great Steve. (Which Steve is up to you :) May have had       > something to do with the fact that Apple makes alot of it's money from       > hardware sales, and can't possibly compete with 'cloners'. Look what       > happened when they temporarily opened themselves up to cloning in the       > 90's. OUCH.              Apple is now the world's 2nd largest Pump n' Dump scheme ( right behind       Google). They've already siphoned off 25 percent of people's mutual       fund monies by going from $44 to $35...will they go for 50 percent?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca