home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.os.beos      Underrated early 90's OS, sad it died...      1,512 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 995 of 1,512   
   John Bailo to Afrosheenix   
   Re: OsX compared to Linux and BeOS   
   27 Apr 05 19:57:14   
   
   XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, alt.os.linux.mandrake, comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   XPost: alt.os.linux.redhat   
   From: jabailo@texeme.com   
      
   Afrosheenix wrote:   
      
   >  Fact 1. While OSX was still in the works, when Jobs was trying to   
   > figure out how to blend old code with the NEXT architecture, Apple   
      
   You mean sell off his old assets to Apple.   
      
   > developed twin systems. Remember Blue Box/Yellow Box/Red Box? Yeah. One   
   > of those ran natively on x86 hardware.   
   >   
   >  Fact 2. Apple, at one time, had every intention of shipping Rhapsody   
   > for x86. Why they didn't is anyone's guess, maybe had something to do   
      
   Cool, so I could listen to Sheryl Crow on OSX!   
      
   > with the company nearly tanking before the iMac's debut and the return   
   > of Insanely Great Steve. (Which Steve is up to you :) May have had   
   > something to do with the fact that Apple makes alot of it's money from   
   > hardware sales, and can't possibly compete with 'cloners'. Look what   
   > happened when they temporarily opened themselves up to cloning in the   
   > 90's. OUCH.   
      
   Apple is now the world's 2nd largest Pump n' Dump scheme ( right behind   
   Google).   They've already siphoned off 25 percent of people's mutual   
   fund monies by going from $44 to $35...will they go for 50 percent?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca