Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.development    |    Operating system development chatter    |    4,255 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,328 of 4,255    |
|    mutazilah@gmail.com to Elijah Stone    |
|    Re: TLS 1.0    |
|    19 Jun 21 10:49:40    |
      From: muta...@gmail.com              On Saturday, June 19, 2021 at 5:21:19 PM UTC+10, Elijah Stone wrote:              > > The browser people seem to be in a conspiracy to prevent people from       > > accessing a TLS 1.0 server, even internally within a company.              > There are very sound reasons to disallow the use of TLS 1.0 entirely.       > Namely: downgrade attacks. There is no conspiracy.              What downgrade attack are you talking about when       a browser is used internally within a company?              > > Sounds to me like there's a market for a rival browser that enables the       > > use of TLS 1.0, perhaps with a warning.              > Not really. You can (relatively) trivially compile old versions of       > chrome/firefox.              By "chrome" did you mean "chromium"? I don't think the       former is open source.              > > I assume there is no public domain code available to do [TLS]       >       > https://github.com/eduardsui/tlse              Thanks. The code is BSD and it uses a library which doesn't       have a copyright notice, but doesn't have a "public domain"       dedication either. So it's probably classified as implicitly       copyrighted freeware.              BFN. Paul.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca