Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.development    |    Operating system development chatter    |    4,255 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,421 of 4,255    |
|    mutazilah@gmail.com to Scott Lurndal    |
|    Re: microsoft vs linux    |
|    05 Jul 21 15:13:33    |
      From: muta...@gmail.com              On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 1:29:07 AM UTC+10, Scott Lurndal wrote:              > While loading the shared objects on behalf of the application, the RTLD       > will fill in the GOT and PLT tables with the virtual addresses that the       > shared objects are loaded at (they can be different from run to run       > and each application will load the shared objects at different virtual       > addresses in the application).       >       > The application then branches through the PLT to get to 'write', 'read',       > 'open', 'fopen', 'fclose', 'printf' etc.              This sounds exactly like Windows.              And that is very different from UEFI, which passes a pointer       of callable functions, right?              Which one is better in your opinion - UEFI or Linux?              And UEFI actually takes 2 parameters, not one. Are       two necessary/desirable?              And under what circumstances should the parameter       after envp be used?              Thanks. Paul.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca