Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.development    |    Operating system development chatter    |    4,255 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,645 of 4,255    |
|    mutazilah@gmail.com to muta...@gmail.com    |
|    Re: PDOS/86    |
|    16 Jul 21 08:06:37    |
      From: muta...@gmail.com              On Saturday, July 17, 2021 at 12:32:15 AM UTC+10, muta...@gmail.com wrote:              > > available. I was thinking it would be useful to do the       > > latter if I had mixed 32-bit and 16-bit code. But if I was       > > doing that, I would have a different GDT, like I already       > > have in current PDOS/386 (ie very minimal). And flip       > > between the two.              > Since I can only get 512 MiB for 16-bit programs anyway,       > I may as well have the mandatory 6 selectors or whatever       > to address the first 3.5 GiB of memory for 32-bit programs       > and the rest of the selectors used for 16-bit programs in       > the other 512 MiB of memory.              I don't suppose there is a way to have, in addition to the       above, of having 64-bit programs run in the 4 GiB to       32 GiB region?              According to this:              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64#Operating_modes              there is 16-bit and 32-bit available to some degree, even       in long mode.              My requirement is for the selected subset of 8086       programs that follow "the rules" to work in their       allotted 512 MiB region. So that means the programs       load cs and ds constantly. If that is not available in       this "CM16", it's no use to me, and I'll stick to running       16-bit programs in PM32 for now.              BFN. Paul.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca