Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.development    |    Operating system development chatter    |    4,255 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,735 of 4,255    |
|    mutazilah@gmail.com to James Harris    |
|    Re: PDOS/86    |
|    20 Jul 21 03:29:06    |
      From: muta...@gmail.com              On Monday, July 19, 2021 at 4:57:35 AM UTC+10, James Harris wrote:              > The difference is not always as simple as an 0x66 prefix byte. For              The 0x66 goes away completely simply by setting the       D bit appropriately in the descriptor.              > example, x86-16 and x86-32 can encode memory addresses in completely       > different ways. Consider the SIB byte encoding for 16-bit and 32-bit       > modes at       >       > [BX] in 16-bit mode       > [EDI] in 32-bit mode              Does this issue also go away if the D bit is set appropriately       in the descriptor table?              If not, the instruction needs to be eliminated from the C       compiler's repertoire to provide a lowest common       denominator.              And my question is - does that LCD give you a Turing machine?              If so, I finally know how to build my 8086 executables.              Thanks. Paul.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca