Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.development    |    Operating system development chatter    |    4,255 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,776 of 4,255    |
|    mutazilah@gmail.com to muta...@gmail.com    |
|    Re: PDOS/86    |
|    07 Aug 21 17:16:41    |
      From: muta...@gmail.com              On Friday, August 6, 2021 at 3:01:53 PM UTC+10, muta...@gmail.com wrote:       > On Friday, July 23, 2021 at 5:32:07 AM UTC+10, anti...@math.uni.wroc.pl       wrote:              > > Well, if you have segment of 16-bit code on 386, then       > > old instructions work as before and you need prefixes       > > for 32-bit addressing and 32-bit operandes. So if you       > > hate modes you can forget about 32-bit mode and use       > > 16-bit one, using prefixed instructions when needed.              > EXCELLENT!!! That's exactly what I am after. I want to       > have all 16-bit segments and generate the x'66' prefixes       > for the 32-bit mode. At a later date I may choose to       > switch to 32-bit segments.       >       > But I want time.              Specifically I would like to have a 16-bit assembler       program that does a far call to xxx and xxx has been       implemented as 32-bit code to obtain 5 MB of memory       and do a complex calculation before returning to the       16-bit caller.              I need some additional MSDOS calls for 5 MB of memory       to be obtained. And a compiler that will generate appropriate       code.              BFN. Paul.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca