Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.development    |    Operating system development chatter    |    4,255 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,801 of 4,255    |
|    Joe Monk to All    |
|    Re: PDOS/86    |
|    22 Aug 21 14:40:47    |
      From: joemonk64@gmail.com              > I am not sure what that means. Is it that the CSECT contains code,       > variables, and records (i.e. memory set aside for records rather than       > declarations which don't in themselves occupy memory)?              CSECTs contain executable code, variables, etc. DSECTs are for DATA ONLY.              > If so, it sounds as though such programs would not be re-entrant. Nor       > could you have multiple copies of records other than what you'd       > pre-arranged space for. That all sounds a bit limiting so I guess you       > mean something else.              They can be written to be re-entrant. As an example, the entire MVS OS is       written in re-entrant assembler. Re-entrancy is a construct on the mainframe.       We also have something called refreshable code, as well as re-usable code.              > BTW, in IBM Assembler how do you request memory dynamically? Is there       > some equivalent of malloc?              We use a macro called GETMAIN, which calls the memory management SVC 120. When       done, you free the storage via a FREEMAIN macro.              Joe              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca