From: nowhere@never.at
On 27.08.2021 04:23, Rod Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 00:03:28 -0500
>> On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 08:12:38 -0500
>>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 12:48:01 -0500
>>>> On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 20:23:19 -0500
>>>> Rod Pemberton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> OMG! Mozilla enabled their broken rendering engine for Firefox
>>>>> 89.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>
>>>>> E.g., MotionMark1.1 results for my 2009 components computer:
>>>>>
>>>>> 89.0 74+ without Webrender - 100% correctly rendered
>>>>> 89.0 4.33 with Webrender - ~70% correctly rendered
>>>>>
>>>>> 88.0.1 72+ without Webrender - 100% correctly rendered
>>>>> 88.0.1 1.08 with Webrender - ~30% correctly rendered
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>> Update:
>>>>
>>>> 89.0.1 76.18 without Webrender
>>>> 89.0.1 4.19 with Webrender
>>>>
>>>> AMD RS780 (DRM 2.40.0 / 3.18.16, LLVM 9.0.1)
>>>> 3.0 Mesa 19.2.8
>>>> mesa/r600
>>>>
>>>
>>> Update:
>>>
>>> 89.0.2 71.33 without Webrender
>>> 89.0.2 4.44 with Webrender
>>>
>>>
>>> Complete results:
>>>
>>> FF Webrender OFF ON
>>> MotionMark 71.33 4.44
>>> Multiply 1.00 pass 1.00 fail
>>> Canvas Arcs 352.20 pass 1.00 fail
>>> Leaves 69.48 pass 84.13 pass
>>> Paths 1156.07 pass 1.00 fail
>>> Canvas Lines 1117.47 pass 1.00 fail
>>> Focus 18.89 pass 19.80 pass
>>> Images 41.47 pass 2.00 pass
>>> Design 36.51 pass 2.74 pass
>>> Suits 52.83 pass 73.29 pass
>>>
>>> The higher the score, the more accurate and more complete the
>>> rendering appeared (subjective).
>>>
>>
>> Firefox 90.0.2 64-bit Linux
>>
>> (webrender off on)
>>
>> MotionMark 1.1 70.81 4.93
>> Multiply 1.00 1.00
>> Canvas Arcs 396.93 3.00
>> Leaves 73.96 9.00
>> Paths 1187.56 2.00
>> Canvas Lines 996.20 1.00
>> Focus 23.74 20.95
>> Images 39.50 2.00
>> Design 27.28 6.40
>> Suits 50.41 119.73
>>
>> Well, they're clearly still having issues with this. Their "Leaves"
>> test performance completely died, while their "Suits" test performance
>> improved immensely. They had moderate improvements on other tests.
>>
>
> MotionMark 1.1 71.15 6.84
> Multiply 1.00 1.00
> Canvas Arcs 344.58 1.00
> Leaves 73.29 122.67
> Paths 1367.65 3.00
> Canvas Lines 993.32 1.00
> Focus 21.97 24.50
> Images 37.61 4.00
> Design 30.19 5.56
> Suits 54.57 163.36
>
> They restored and improved their "Leaves" performance for webrender.
> They improved their "Suits" performance. And, "Focus" improved a bit.
> Other tests have slight improvements and slight declines. Now, I'm
> wondering if only "Leaves" and "Suits" are what they're focused upon?
> Or, if "Focus" is also a base requirement, as "Focus" test mostly
> matches hardware performance, but the other two now outperform hardware.
Thanks for keep track on it, I didn't upgrade to latest FireFox yet, but
I had to upgrade ThunderBird just now (it wouldn't load w/o).
Every update makes the whole Mozilla story worse in terms of size and
start load time [TB takes up to 30sec to open].
I didn't check on details, so I dunno how to disable or alter any bit.
Where would I have to start ? in this 'not recommended' config ?
__
wolfgang
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
