From: noemail@basdxcqvbe.com   
      
   On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 00:03:28 -0500   
   Rod Pemberton wrote:   
      
   > On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 08:12:38 -0500   
   > Rod Pemberton wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 12:48:01 -0500   
   > > Rod Pemberton wrote:   
   > > > On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 20:23:19 -0500   
   > > > Rod Pemberton wrote:   
   >   
   > > > >    
   > > > >   
   > > > > OMG! Mozilla enabled their broken rendering engine for Firefox   
   > > > > 89.0.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > [snip]   
   > > > >   
   > > > > E.g., MotionMark1.1 results for my 2009 components computer:   
   > > > >   
   > > > > 89.0 74+ without Webrender - 100% correctly rendered   
   > > > > 89.0 4.33 with Webrender - ~70% correctly rendered   
   > > > >   
   > > > > 88.0.1 72+ without Webrender - 100% correctly rendered   
   > > > > 88.0.1 1.08 with Webrender - ~30% correctly rendered   
   > > > >   
   > > > >   
   > > > > [snip]   
   > > >   
   > > > Update:   
   > > >   
   > > > 89.0.1 76.18 without Webrender   
   > > > 89.0.1 4.19 with Webrender   
   > > >   
   > > > AMD RS780 (DRM 2.40.0 / 3.18.16, LLVM 9.0.1)   
   > > > 3.0 Mesa 19.2.8   
   > > > mesa/r600   
   > > >   
   > >   
   > > Update:   
   > >   
   > > 89.0.2 71.33 without Webrender   
   > > 89.0.2 4.44 with Webrender   
   > >   
   > >   
   > > Complete results:   
   > >   
   > > FF Webrender OFF ON   
   > > MotionMark 71.33 4.44   
   > > Multiply 1.00 pass 1.00 fail   
   > > Canvas Arcs 352.20 pass 1.00 fail   
   > > Leaves 69.48 pass 84.13 pass   
   > > Paths 1156.07 pass 1.00 fail   
   > > Canvas Lines 1117.47 pass 1.00 fail   
   > > Focus 18.89 pass 19.80 pass   
   > > Images 41.47 pass 2.00 pass   
   > > Design 36.51 pass 2.74 pass   
   > > Suits 52.83 pass 73.29 pass   
   > >   
   > > The higher the score, the more accurate and more complete the   
   > > rendering appeared (subjective).   
   > >   
   >   
   > Firefox 90.0.2 64-bit Linux   
   >   
   > (webrender off on)   
   >   
   > MotionMark 1.1 70.81 4.93   
   > Multiply 1.00 1.00   
   > Canvas Arcs 396.93 3.00   
   > Leaves 73.96 9.00   
   > Paths 1187.56 2.00   
   > Canvas Lines 996.20 1.00   
   > Focus 23.74 20.95   
   > Images 39.50 2.00   
   > Design 27.28 6.40   
   > Suits 50.41 119.73   
   >   
   > Well, they're clearly still having issues with this. Their "Leaves"   
   > test performance completely died, while their "Suits" test performance   
   > improved immensely. They had moderate improvements on other tests.   
   >   
      
   MotionMark 1.1 71.15 6.84   
   Multiply 1.00 1.00   
   Canvas Arcs 344.58 1.00   
   Leaves 73.29 122.67   
   Paths 1367.65 3.00   
   Canvas Lines 993.32 1.00   
   Focus 21.97 24.50   
   Images 37.61 4.00   
   Design 30.19 5.56   
   Suits 54.57 163.36   
      
   They restored and improved their "Leaves" performance for webrender.   
   They improved their "Suits" performance. And, "Focus" improved a bit.   
   Other tests have slight improvements and slight declines. Now, I'm   
   wondering if only "Leaves" and "Suits" are what they're focused upon?   
   Or, if "Focus" is also a base requirement, as "Focus" test mostly   
   matches hardware performance, but the other two now outperform hardware.   
      
   --   
   Why is it that the most liberal tech companies become the most   
   authoritarian?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|