Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.development    |    Operating system development chatter    |    4,255 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,831 of 4,255    |
|    Joe Monk to All    |
|    Re: 32-bit z/Arch    |
|    05 Sep 21 09:40:45    |
      From: joemonk64@gmail.com              > They were not "minor" changes. For example, the S/360 used core memory. How       much more memory (and hardware changes) would have been required to implement       32-bit memory as opposed to the 24-bit memory?              For instance, from the 360-91 functional characteristics, the processor       storage capabilities, the system could only have 2MB of main storage, and 4MB       of extended storage.              In 1960's memory was approximately $2.6 million per megabyte. So, a fully       loaded 360-91 with 6 megabytes of storage was north of $12 million in 1960       dollars.              According to the inflation calculator, $1 in 1960 buys the same as $10 today.       So, the same computer in todays dollars was $120 million! And IBM spent $5       billion in 1960 dollars to develop the 360...              Joe              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca