Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.development    |    Operating system development chatter    |    4,255 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,966 of 4,255    |
|    wolfgang kern to muta...@gmail.com    |
|    Re: BEL    |
|    05 Dec 21 21:13:30    |
      From: nowhere@nevernet.at              On 05/12/2021 07:23, muta...@gmail.com wrote:       > On Sunday, December 5, 2021 at 4:30:48 PM UTC+11, Frank Kotler wrote:       >       >>> And if I had designed a teletype in the same era that had a       >>> coffee maker attached, would the designers of ASCII have       >>> reserved a control character to switch it on?       >       >> We don't know.       >       > You don't need to take my question so literally.       >       > If YOU were designing ASCII back in 1960 or whenever, and       > a teletype existed that had a coffee machine, would YOU have       > reserved a control character (or sequence, like the ANSI       > escapes) to switch it on?       >       > What makes sense to put in a stream?              there actually were Tele-Type codes (taken over by ASCII later on)       defined DC1..DC4 as special purpose because they were rare used for       communication controls.       I remember that some folks connected their TTY-receiver to household       equipment to turn on heat or light or remote open the garage door by       using a sequence of BELL and various DC for such.       This gimmicks didn't last very long because good friends often played       silly games and made the story pretty unsafe.              I still use code 07 for error beep, but ignore it on incoming strings.       __       wolfgang              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca