Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.development    |    Operating system development chatter    |    4,255 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,972 of 4,255    |
|    Rod Pemberton to All    |
|    OT: What features do you look for in an     |
|    07 Dec 21 08:02:40    |
      XPost: alt.lang.asm       From: noemail@basdxcqvbe.com              Hey guys, I'm curious, what features do you look for in an x86       processor?              How would you rank the following in terms of importance for a       processor's performance?              clock speed       cache size       unlocked cores       number of cores              I would probably rank them as listed above.              For a long time now, I've been really happy with an unlocked processor.       The unlocked nature of the processor means it doesn't usually grind       away at a task for a long time, but it finishes in a quick blip, even       though it's only a dual-core. In other words, it seems that processor       speed - both raw clock speed and extra speed from the unlocked cores -       is far more important than having more cores. From earlier processors,       it seemed that a bigger cache was the next biggest improvement after       clock speed. But, of course, this processor is a decade or so old now.       I'm sure you guys have moved on to newer hardware. What are your       thoughts on this? Has much changed in regards to this over the past       decade?                     --              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca