Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.development    |    Operating system development chatter    |    4,255 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,128 of 4,255    |
|    mutazilah@gmail.com to Joe Monk    |
|    Re: clarified goal    |
|    17 Mar 22 07:54:32    |
      From: muta...@gmail.com              On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 9:05:00 PM UTC+11, Joe Monk wrote:              > > It is certainly not "unowned" in the sense that the first        > > person who finds it can pick it up and claim ownership        > > of it.              > "Public-domain software is software that has been placed in the public       domain: in other words, software for which there is absolutely no ownership       such as copyright, trademark, or patent. Software in the public domain can be       modified, distributed, or        sold even without any attribution by anyone; this is unlike the common case of       software under exclusive copyright, where software licenses grant limited       usage rights."               No individual or other subset of the public owns it.              The public as a whole can do what they want with it       because they effectively, as a whole, own it.              Semantic debate though. What would be the difference       between public ownership and no ownership?              BFN. Paul.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca