Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.development    |    Operating system development chatter    |    4,255 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,162 of 4,255    |
|    mutazilah@gmail.com to Scott Lurndal    |
|    Re: sector size    |
|    18 Apr 22 11:16:19    |
      From: muta...@gmail.com              On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 11:46:39 PM UTC+10, Scott Lurndal wrote:              > >I checked out INT 13H AH=08H and I was surprised       > >that the sector size wasn't one of the things returned.       > >       > >Nor could I see another BIOS call that would return       > >that.       > >       > >What's the reason that isn't present in the BIOS?              > Probably because only one sector size was supported.              What is the logic behind choosing a sector size?       Could they have chosen a sector size of 1 byte?       Or 4096 right from the start?              Also, is the switch from 512 to 4096 being done       purely because they are exceeding the 32-bit       sector number? Previously when they were using       CHS addressing, basically 24-bit, they switched to       LBA to get the 32 bits. But why not make an       LBA-enhanced that is 64 bits?              Thanks. Paul.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca