Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.development    |    Operating system development chatter    |    4,255 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,178 of 4,255    |
|    mutazilah@gmail.com to Alexei A. Frounze    |
|    Re: exceeding 64k    |
|    22 Apr 22 13:41:01    |
      From: muta...@gmail.com              On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 2:25:13 AM UTC+10, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:              > One typical solution is to split the compiler into several       > stages, each executing the other as a separate program       > with the communication between them done via files       > containing intermediate results.              Ok, but that requires the programmer to change the       way they program, because the code they would       naturally write exceeds 64k of machine code.              My question is - is the 8086 the only processor that       still has 16-bit registers, but allows the naturally-written       program with more than 64k of machine code, to       be built by a compiler?              Or is there some other technique that would work on       the Commodore 128 or some other machine that       allowed more than 64k of memory with only 16-bit       or 8-bit registers?              Thanks. Paul.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca