Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.development    |    Operating system development chatter    |    4,255 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,281 of 4,255    |
|    mutazilah@gmail.com to Joe Monk    |
|    Re: segmentation    |
|    20 Sep 22 13:12:28    |
      From: muta...@gmail.com              On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 8:41:54 PM UTC+8, Joe Monk wrote:       > > Wrong. In zarch, in am64, 32 bit programs        > > don't wrap.        > >        > > You're right about s390, but not right if        > > you're suggesting it's not possible to        > > create a modified s390.       > Hercules is the hercules team's own implementation of a software defined       machine that can execute the IBM instruction set. Hercules is not s/370.       Hercules is not s/390. Hercules is not z/Arch. When you monkey around with       hercules, all you are doing is        changing the way the hercules VM executes. You are not in the least changing       anything about the way IBM does/did it, nor are you changing the specs for an       IBM architecture.        >        > So, if you want to say it's possible to create a modified hercules, then       sure. But thats all it is, a modified hercules.        >        > "Hercules is compliant with IBM's ALS-1, ALS-2 and ALS-3 architectural level       sets to the degree necessary to run all OS/390 versions through 2.10 and known       versions of z/OS in both ARCHLVL 1 and ARCHLVL 2 mode, and Linux and z/VM in       both ESA/390 and z/       Architecture mode."        >        > Joe              I didn't mention Hercules and I didn't say       I could force IBM to do something and       I didn't say I could magically change       existing s/390 processors. Nor did I       say I could force IBM to make       documentation changes.              What I said was:              1. 32 bit programs can run on an       unmodified zarch in am64.              2. It would be possible for someone,       not necessarily IBM, to make a slight       modification to a s390 chip, to make       it run 32 bit programs that access the       entire 4 GB.              If you dispute either of these technical,       not political, statements, then tell me       which one and very clearly why, so       that we can attempt to come to a       common understanding.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca