Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.development    |    Operating system development chatter    |    4,255 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,422 of 4,255    |
|    Joe Monk to All    |
|    Re: segmentation    |
|    10 Nov 22 04:27:34    |
      From: joemonk64@gmail.com              > What possible definition do you have for a 31-bit executable?       > What does that mean, e.g. when that exact same executable is       > running on S/370 (as AM24) or z/Arch (as AM64)?       >       > What terminology do you use to distinguish an executable that       > is using 32-bit pointers using only S/390 instructions and one       > that is using 64-bit pointers, using z/Arch instructions?       >              Sorry, but I wont bite. You're trying to shoehorn the mainframe into a box.              Take the following code, all executed on the same platform, in the same CSECT:               SAM24        LA 1,x'1'        SAM31        LA 1,x'1'        SAM64        LA 1,x'1'              There is no 'bitness' to the executable produced by assembling the above code.       The LA instruction doesnt change 'bitness', it is still LA.              Joe              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca