Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.development    |    Operating system development chatter    |    4,255 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,993 of 4,255    |
|    Paul Edwards to All    |
|    Re: Usenet reply headers -- was: UEFI bo    |
|    28 Nov 23 05:46:20    |
      From: mutazilah@gmail.com              Hi Grant.              >> Oh, that actually happened, did it? In google       >> groups my posts are appearing in the same thread       >> normally.              > Yep, your message is appearing as a new thread.              Ok, is this one properly threaded?              >> (which I wrote) since google groups became read-only.              > Oh ... Google Groups is far from read-only in general. I think there       > are some newsgroups that are now read-only in Google Groups UI. But the       > thousands of messages from Google Groups flooding other newsgroups (as       > of a few days ago) are evidence of the read-write nature of Google       > Groups Usenet gateway.              Ok, well, I can't click "compose" on comp.lang.c,       and in alt.os.development I can click "compose"       but last time I tried that I was asked to do a       captcha thing and then nothing happened. So I don't       want to waste my time fighting that anymore. I have       a news reader to write! And especially to get it to       fit into the Fidonet style, which is why there is an       "X-Comment-To".              >> I could get the raw headers via eternal september,       >> but that is more laborious. And I still don't know       >> the rules, regardless.              > What rules are you thinking of / concerned about?              The one you clarified - I am required to provide a       "References", but not a "In-Reply-To".              > Both References: and In-Reply-To: include the Message-ID: of the message       > that the reply is directly related to. One, I don't remember which, can       > include more history like reply to a reply to a reply to a reply to an       > original post type thing. -- Sorry, I can't be arsed to look up the       > proper RFC for specifics.              No problem, since I have no intention of implementing       it anyway. :-)              However, I do intend to, and I believe I have, done       the "References", so now that I know there is an issue,       and now that I know the rules, I will hopefully do the       right thing going forward.              BFN. Paul.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca