home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.os.development      Operating system development chatter      4,255 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 3,993 of 4,255   
   Paul Edwards to All   
   Re: Usenet reply headers -- was: UEFI bo   
   28 Nov 23 05:46:20   
   
   From: mutazilah@gmail.com   
      
   Hi Grant.   
      
   >> Oh, that actually happened, did it? In google   
   >> groups my posts are appearing in the same thread   
   >> normally.   
      
   > Yep, your message is appearing as a new thread.   
      
   Ok, is this one properly threaded?   
      
   >> (which I wrote) since google groups became read-only.   
      
   > Oh ... Google Groups is far from read-only in general.  I think there   
   > are some newsgroups that are now read-only in Google Groups UI.  But the   
   > thousands of messages from Google Groups flooding other newsgroups (as   
   > of a few days ago) are evidence of the read-write nature of Google   
   > Groups Usenet gateway.   
      
   Ok, well, I can't click "compose" on comp.lang.c,   
   and in alt.os.development I can click "compose"   
   but last time I tried that I was asked to do a   
   captcha thing and then nothing happened. So I don't   
   want to waste my time fighting that anymore. I have   
   a news reader to write! And especially to get it to   
   fit into the Fidonet style, which is why there is an   
   "X-Comment-To".   
      
   >> I could get the raw headers via eternal september,   
   >> but that is more laborious. And I still don't know   
   >> the rules, regardless.   
      
   > What rules are you thinking of / concerned about?   
      
   The one you clarified - I am required to provide a   
   "References", but not a "In-Reply-To".   
      
   > Both References: and In-Reply-To: include the Message-ID: of the message   
   > that the reply is directly related to.  One, I don't remember which, can   
   > include more history like reply to a reply to a reply to a reply to an   
   > original post type thing.  --  Sorry, I can't be arsed to look up the   
   > proper RFC for specifics.   
      
   No problem, since I have no intention of implementing   
   it anyway. :-)   
      
   However, I do intend to, and I believe I have, done   
   the "References", so now that I know there is an issue,   
   and now that I know the rules, I will hopefully do the   
   right thing going forward.   
      
   BFN. Paul.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca