Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.development    |    Operating system development chatter    |    4,255 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,081 of 4,255    |
|    Herbert Kleebauer to Paul Edwards    |
|    Re: JPEG options    |
|    07 Jan 24 16:15:43    |
      From: klee@unibwm.de              On 07.01.2024 11:31, Paul Edwards wrote:               > I have a very different philosophy to that,        > which can be found here:        >        > https://sourceforge.net/p/pdos/gitcode/ci/master/tree/pdpgoal.txt              This text is a sequence of arguments why GPL is much       superior to PD. Just a few examples:              || The Public Domain Project's philosophy is basically to put as much       || base material into the public domain so that commercial developers,       || or other PD developers, can build upon it, rather than having to       || reinvent the wheel.              That's also true if you replace "PD" by "GPL".                     || It's like inventing the cure for cancer and keeping it a       || secret. You may as well not have bothered.              Let's suppose, a group of scientists have developed such a       medicine, spending many man-years of development and then       releases it into PD. There are still some serious undesirable       effects, so it can't be used as it is. A company analyses the       research results and finds an improvement which removes the       undesirable effects so it now is the medicine, the whole world       is waiting for a long time. But the company isn't stupid, they       claim a patent for the modification, so nobody is allowed to       produce the medicine, even nearly all the work is released to PD.       And because the company isn't stupid, they sell it not for a       fair price for the little work they did, but they sell it for       the highest price they can get. So now we have the medicine, the       whole world is waiting for a long time, but only a few rich counties       are able to pay for it. That wouldn't have happened if a "GPL" instead       a "PD" would have been used.                     I will not comment more of your text, but every sentence in       the text explains way GPL has to be preferred over PD.              Du you really think, Linux would still exist if it were       released in PD? Most contributions to Linux are now made       by companies. Why do you think Google uses Linux for       Android and doesn't develop its own, closed source, kernel?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca